Showing posts with label Intel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Intel. Show all posts

Monday, December 03, 2007

Is 'World War III' Over...

...before it started?

There's only one word for this--

From The New York Times:
WASHINGTON, Dec. 3 — A new assessment by American intelligence agencies concludes that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and that the program remains on hold, contradicting an assessment two years ago that Tehran was working inexorably toward building a bomb.

The conclusions of the new assessment are likely to be major factor in the tense international negotiations aimed at getting Iran to halt its nuclear energy program. Concerns about Iran were raised sharply after President Bush had suggested in October that a nuclear-armed Iran could lead to “World War III,” and Vice President Dick Cheney promised “serious consequences” if the government in Tehran did not abandon its nuclear program.

The finding also come in the middle of a presidential campaign during which a possible military strike against Iran’s nuclear program has been discussed. The assessment, a National Intelligence Estimate that represents the consensus view of all 16 American spy agencies, states that Tehran’s ultimate intentions about gaining a nuclear weapon remain unclear, but that Iran’s “decisions are guided by a cost-benefit approach rather than a rush to a weapon irrespective of the political, economic and military costs.”

(more)
--Devastating.

For the last two years we had to listen hysterical war mongering from this administration and it's favorite Senator.

Even in the wake of this report, there are still bloggers on the right saying ridiculous things like, "note that although the report says Iran has “shelved” their program, it still estimates that they would be technically capable of producing enough enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon within two years. Don’t you feel reassured now?"

When your argument boils down to small caveats about what our perceived enemies are "technically capable" of doing, you've given in to irrational fear. Russia is technically capable of nuking each and every one of our asses right now. Worry about that if you need manufacture a threat to justify your support for this administration.

The point of the NIE is that Iran hasn't been trying to make nuclear weapons. If the Iranians suddenly decide they did want to make nukes it would take until 2010 at the earliest and 2015 at the latest. But the point is--they're NOT WORKING ON IT.

Thankfully, it finally looks like the threat of war with Iran, which would have broken this country, is over. Joe Biden has made it clear that if Bush attacks Iran he's looking at a serious impeachment problem. I don't think that scares Bush for a second, but I like that someone has said something about it. I think it's pretty clear Biden knew this report was coming too. Good play by Biden.

Even the really weak secondary rationale--that we need to bomb Iran to protect the troops in Iraq--for bombing Iran has been undermined recently by Admiral William Fallon and Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

Still a lot of time for Bush and Cheney to do something very stupid, but there's no doubt this is good news.

TAGS: , , ,

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Plenty of Outrage to Go Around

Each of these items deserves their own post, but my blogging time is limited today. Not my outrage about the ongoing shitstorm coming from Bu$hCo™, the criminal conspiracy that poses as a legitimate government. From today's edition of POAC (Project for the OLD American Century, the best news aggregator, IMO)

In yesterday's Washington Post:
A small private intelligence company that monitors Islamic terrorist groups obtained a new Osama bin Laden video ahead of its official release last month, and around 10 a.m. on Sept. 7, it notified the Bush administration of its secret acquisition. It gave two senior officials access on the condition that the officials not reveal they had it until the al-Qaeda release.

Within 20 minutes, a range of intelligence agencies had begun downloading it from the company's Web site. By midafternoon that day, the video and a transcript of its audio track had been leaked from within the Bush administration to cable television news and broadcast worldwide.
In intelligence circles, this is known as 'burning the source.' If you have ever read Tom Clancy's novels (a great writer, even though he's pretty far to the right - and until the Iraq war he was a bit rah-rah about American interventionism) you know about the dilemma that intelligence analysts have when dealing with the product of intelligence operatives. If you act on a particularly juicy item gleaned from the enemy, you could give away the methods by which you garnered that item. You could save lives or gain some other strategic advantage on one hand, but is it worth it? The classic example of this is when the Brits didn't warn the people of Coventry they were about to be firebombed by the Nazis, because to do so would let the Nazis know they had access to an Enigma machine.

This isn't like that. There was no strategic advantage to be had, no lives to be saved. The source was burned just to gain a brief and intangible political advantage, out of purely irresponsible childish stupidity. I've said before that the key to Bush is that he was brought up in an environment where he was always bailed out of any jam he got himself into. 'DUI charges? - no problem, daddy will make it go away. Vietnam draft fears? - I'll get you into the Texas Air National Guard. Don't want to show up for TANG because they want you to piss in the bottle before they give you a multi-million dollar fighter jet? Daddy will fix.' As a result of this - HE HAS NO SENSE OF RESPONSIBILITY WHATSOEVER. The only question left in my mind about George W. Bush is this - is he more evil, or more stupid? Demon or moron? I think I'll just call him demoronic and let it go at that.
Olbermann's excellent take on this story is available at C&L.


Outraged about the wanton killing of civilians by Blackwater, Inc? Me too. The Iraqi government is calling AGAIN to have them out of the country, the sooner the better, as two Christian women got killed yesterday by security contractors in a Baghdad intersection . Not good ol' Joe LIE-berman, who chairs the commitee responsible for government oversight of that kind of thing. He has declared that he won't be chairing an investigation into either the killings or corruption by Iraq contractors in general, as blogged at HuffPo. And this guy posed for most of his political career as a Democrat? As Seth and Amy would say, REALLY?!?

Maybe it's because Blackwater CEO (another hypoChristian fundy, BTW) Erik Prince interned with representative Dana Rohrabacher (R - Huntington Beach, CA) back in 1990 "and they have since become friends." Well, whoopdee-doo. Congresswoman Rohrabacher has said that her old BFF is "An American Hero Just Like Ollie North Was." Considering that North was involved in Iran/Contra up to his neck - illegally selling American high-tech weapons to an enemy in order to illegally fund a bunch of bloodthirsty thugs - and should have ended his career deciding on whether to accept the cigarette or the blindfold, I'll accept that comparison. Except for the hero part, of course.

And one other thing - while Joe-Mo is busily providing no oversight over corruption in Iraq anyway, he might as well not oversee the $750,000,000 (and counting) construction of the American Embassy in Iraq, the opening of which has been delayed indefinitely by shoddy construction from the Kuwaiti contractor. I guess 3/4 of a BILLION dollars just doesn't go as far as it used to. Henry Waxman wrote a letter to Kindasleazy Liesalot asking for an explanation. "Problems were so severe and widespread that the inspectors concluded that none of the buildings on the new embassy compound could be approved for occupancy." Documents showed hundreds of violations of fire codes and other regulations and electrical problems throughout the complex.

Not content just to waste vast amounts of money in Iraq and in support of tax cuts for the elite, Bu$hCo™ have allocated yet more funds to pushing a national ad campaign promoting abstinence. That should at least help their friends in the porn industry. No money of course is available to help sick children, but one suspects that some is getting funneled to the sick pundits of the reight wing who attack those very children from their various positions in the 'mainstream' Corporate-Owned Media.

Kind of gives a new meaning to the term 'bully pulpit', doesn't it?

Of course there's plenty of residual outrage over the usual things - the administration's lawless defiance of FISA, the continued unconstitutional 'suspension' of habeas corpus, torture, rendition, the growing threat from multinational corporations.. ..ad nauseum. And all of that is contributing to a growing outrage that Congress and the Democrats are doing little more than ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to address any of the above. Democracy cannot function in the absence of a real opposition party, or a press corps dedicated to the truth.
"The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands may justly be pronounced the very definition of a tyranny."
-- James Madison --
Isn't that exactly what we're seeing happen every day?

TAGS: , , ,

Monday, July 09, 2007

Eerily Familiar

Doesn't this look and sound eerily familiar?

US agencies (played so convincingly by Harvey Keitel and others) are closing in on the leaders of the terrorists. They have them in the cross-hairs. They phone home by high-tech satellite link for permission to pull the trigger, but can't get those woosie REMFs in the White House to give the OK.

Oh yeah, that was the plot of the onerous ABC/Disney propaganda film Path to 9/11, except that little piece of fiction (written by reight-wing Josef Goebbels wannabe Cyrus Nowrasteh) erroneously tried to saddle Bill Clinton with the blame - and was conveniently scheduled to air just before the November, '06 midterm elections.

Well it didn't work, lots of Republicans got kicked to the curb by the voters, no Democrats lost their seats. Now we find the EXACT OPPOSITE scenario did play out in reality.

Watch.

Bush Called Off Attacks Against Al Qaeda

Cross-posted to Ice Station Tango
TAGS: , , ,

Saturday, April 28, 2007

Looking Back in Anger

As the impeachment movement begins to gain traction, some key information about the origins of the Iraq War continue to dribble out.

For example, Senator Dick Durbin recently disclosed on the floor of the Senate that even though the intelligence committee that he is a member of had evidence which contradicted public administration claims about WMD in Iraq, he could do nothing because members of that committee are sworn to secrecy (h/t Crooks and Liars).



They should have broke that law.

The other revelation is about the deliberations conducted by the administration concerning the war. There were NO deliberations. This confirmation of the obvious comes from former CIA director George Tenet, who just published a big juicy book.

From The Independent:

The row over how President Bush went to war in Iraq has re-erupted with a charge by George Tenet, the former director of the CIA, that a coterie of top officials pushed America into the conflict with no real debate as to whether Saddam Hussein actually posed an imminent threat to the US.

Mr Tenet's angry indictment of his colleagues is the first of its kind from a top ranking member of Mr Bush's once-vaunted national security team, and was instantly rebutted by the White House.

(more)
I'm not exactly impressed by Tenet and Durbin's "revelations". These were things that many of us knew all along and these guys seem to be putting this stuff out there at a really convenient time.

Why isn't Durbin still sworn to secrecy? Because everyone knows that the administration was lying? So? If you can break secrecy to point out a lie, why do you have to wait for public opinon to catch up?

George Tenet would look a lot better without the profit motive of selling a book and without that big ass medal hanging from his neck.

This one:

Thanks guys for speaking out, next time, do it as soon as you know that the lunatics have taken over and are going to get hundreds of thousands of people killed.

Crossposted at IST.

TAGS: , , ,

Friday, February 09, 2007

The Iraq News

Death of Anna Nicole Smith, Some War's Going On... More

With the death of Anna Nicole Smith providing cable and network news with manna from heaven in the form of endless tragedy-bleached headlines AT THE EXPENSE OF REAL NEWS STORIES, coverage of the war will be on the back burner. Off the stove, really.

But what's a few billion dollars on pallets or confirmation of manipulated intel compared to one famous, drug-addled, heiress supermodel reality show hasbeen? Godspeed Anna Nicole.

For the rest of you diehards, here's...

...The Iraq News:
VIDEO: BBC reports on a scam involving contractors in Iraq. I thought the whole war was... screw it. We go forward.
VIDEO: Fox Noise owner Rupert Murdoch admits trying to lead nation into war.



TAGS: , , ,

Crossposted at Ice Station Tango.